The Bombay High Court again adjourned the hearing of the drugs-on-cruise case till Thursday afternoon after hearing the arguments of Amit Desai and Mukul Rohatgi.
This was the second day of the hearing of the case in the high court. On Thursday, additional solicitor general Anil Kumar Singh will present the NCB arguments.
Mukul Rohtagi, who appeared for Aryan Khan on Wednesday said the arrest memo did not give true and correct grounds for arrest. Referring to Section 50 of the CrPC Act, Rohatgi said, “Article 22 of the Constitution is more important than Section 50 of CrPC. It states that no person should be held without being informed about the grounds of arrest and the person shall have the right to consult a lawyer of his choiceâ€.
Rohatgi said the remand application was misleading as it projected that a large quantity of drugs was recovered from Aryan Khan.
Senior advocate Amit Desai said there was no ‘conspiracy’ over the rave party. Aryan, Arbaaz and Munmun were arrested individually and at that time the charge of conspiracy was not imposed.
“Especially when the offences alleged are punishable with less than one year. A notice under section 41a of the CrPC should have been issued, asking them to join the investigation,†Desai said.
“Bail is the rule and jail is the exception. Now it has become arrest is the rule and bail is the exception,†Desai said.
“I am seeking bail in a case where the punishment is only one year. And where there is no evidence of conspiracy,†Desai said. As Aryan, Arbaaz and Moonmoon were arrested for not consuming the drugs, Desai said that they have been arrested for an offence which is not committed. The intention to consume should not apply as no medical test was done.
