Nagpur’s beloved Futala Lake has once again become the centre of a high-stakes legal showdown. On Monday, the Supreme Court reserved its verdict on whether the iconic waterbody is a protected wetland or simply a man-made tank — a ruling that could reshape its future.
The case, filed by NGO Swacch Association, Nagpur, challenges flashy redevelopment works at the lake — from a floating laser show and musical fountain to a towering artificial steel banyan tree built by MahaMetro. Petitioners argue these projects disturb the lake’s ecology, block natural rainwater inflows, and risk shrinking its capacity.
Authorities, however, insist Futala is not classified as a wetland under the 2017 Wetlands Rules. The Nagpur Metropolitan Region Development Authority (NMRDA) and MahaMetro defended the banyan tree, citing VNIT reports that describe it as a “floating” structure anchored by chains and blocks — removable, not permanent.
The debate boiled down to one question: is Futala a biodiversity-rich wetland needing strict safeguards, or a historical tank meant for water storage and civic use? Chief Justice Bhushan Gavai, heading the three-judge bench, even noted from personal visits that the contested banyan tree stood at the lakefront, not its catchment.
After hours of arguments, the bench reserved judgment. Until the ruling, Futala remains suspended between heritage and modern spectacle — a lake that still irrigates Telankhedi Garden while waiting for its legal identity to be sealed
👉 Click here to read the latest Gujarat news on TheLiveAhmedabad.com